It is clear that a car is best done with WinOLS
if you have the give, but if you leave a car to schedule early in the
afternoon and pass it to pick up as the limit at the last minute and
WinOLS not give for that car. How long do you have to search the map and
try to identify and program until it fine?
That’s the problem WinOLS without we would take forever to locate and
map to map and define their similar and it takes longer to modify
With Ecm Titanium
you leave the essential potential maps to make a normalita repro
without squeezing the most of the engine, maps advance, correction,
singles, boot and other we all know that if you know not to touch them
better not make it clear not appear because you can fuck the engine or
turbo pump.
The problem of ecm titanium is that poorly defines the axes of the
maps but for me it is no problem because I edit the driver and change
the dimensions of X axis and Y to make it look as real as possible and
then apply I conversion factors relevant to Z.
Then if I have to look for other important maps that the program does
not reflect in their drivers, do you make them yourself, I look in 2D
or 3D and is very easy to select the memory location from where it
starts to where it ends the map and define their axes as with any other
program.
My conclusion is that if you know how a map and as I touch it, the two program can go well but WinOLS v1.500
has more advanced options and is more accurate, but I think a change
is slower to use when you start with a new ECU do not know.
Another thing is when you bring a car and you leave him time to do it
well get all the juice to the engine and everything is perfect, things
change.
So i think that if a person does not know how the parts of an engine
and the engine ESN do work and not known as a map, leapfrogging is to
have one or another program works.
More Car Diagnostic Software,pls visit China OBD2 website:
http://www.uobdii.com/wholesale/car-diagnostic-software/
No comments:
Post a Comment